翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Explanatory dictionary
・ Explanatory dictionary of the Georgian language
・ Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great Russian Language
・ Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language
・ Explanatory gap
・ Explanatory model
・ Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament
・ Explanatory power
・ Explanatory style
・ Explant culture
・ Explara
・ Expletive
・ Expletive attributive
・ Expletive deleted
・ Expletive Delighted!
Expletive infixation
・ Expleuracanthus
・ Explication
・ Explication de Texte
・ Explicature
・ Explicit
・ Explicit algebraic stress model
・ Explicit and implicit methods
・ Explicit Congestion Notification
・ Explicit cost
・ Explicit data graph execution
・ Explicit formula
・ Explicit formulae (L-function)
・ Explicit Game
・ Explicit Ills


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Expletive infixation : ウィキペディア英語版
Expletive infixation
Expletive infixation is a process by which an expletive or profanity is inserted into a word, usually for intensification. It is similar to tmesis, but not all instances are covered by the usual definition of ''tmesis'' because the words are not necessarily compounds.
The most commonly inserted English expletives are adjectival: either participles (''fucking'', ''mother-fucking'', ''freaking'', ''blooming'', ''bleeding'', ''damned'') or adjectives (''bloody'').
Although most speakers are not exposed to these formations until after childhood, they can form new examples readily once introduced to the process, and their judgments of which formations are acceptable are remarkably consistent. This suggests that the rules for the placement of the expletive are not arbitrary, but instead derive from fundamental aspects of English phonology.
A simple rule is that the insertion occurs at a syllable boundary, usually just before the primary stressed syllable.〔 Thus, one hears ''abso-fuckin'-lutely'' rather than
*''ab-fuckin'-solutely''. This rule is insufficient to describe examples such as ''un-fuckin'-believable'', however, so modifications to this rule are proposed such as morpheme boundaries taking precedence over stress. Counterexamples to this exception do exist: ''unbe-fuckin'-lievable''.〔http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Citations:unbefuckinglievable#English〕
A more fundamental theory due to John McCarthy is based on prosody.〔 Its basic principle is that "the metrical stress tree of the host is minimally restructured to accommodate the stress tree of the infix". For example, although ''unbelievable'' and ''irresponsible'' have identical stress patterns, and the first syllable of each is a separate morpheme, the preferred insertion points are different: ''un-fuckin'-believable'', but ''irre-fuckin'-sponsible''. McCarthy explains this by saying they have different prosodic structures: un(be((lieva)ble)), but (irre)((sponsi)ble). The infix cannot fall between the syllables ''ir'' and ''re'' because they form a single prosodic foot.
==Examples in Popular Culture==

* "abso-bloomin'-lutely" in "Wouldn't It Be Loverly", a song from ''My Fair Lady''.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Expletive infixation」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.